Urban Density Destroys QOL

Commentary by D. Martinez

QOL is Quality of Life. It is why many of us live here.

Well, thanks to the mayor, city council and the lack of planning department, you can bid farewell to QOL. The reason: they want to ramp up density. WhY? Might be votes, but more likely some hidden, financial agenda, we simply don’t know.

Every time something get’s re-built, the developers make oodles through often hidden, and lucrative arrangements with the city. Many would argue that this is not in the best interest of the city, but in someone’s pocketbook. And since meetings don’t have full disclosure and record until it is officially on the city agenda in some way, you and I don’t know behind the scenes negotiations and agreements.

In general, opposing re-development that increases density is a good idea. The reasons? Tax subsidies that you pay for, not the developer are reason one. Increased strain on city resources like roads, water, sewer, and schools. And then there is traffic. Denver is now #3 in worst traffic in the U.S. Each of these density bumps strains resources and downgrades QOL. What used to take you a 17 minute drive is now 41 minutes. Isn’t density wonderful?

Oh, then there is the argument to put in affordable housing and retail. First, Denver has built approximately 40,250 apartments in the last two years and we need more lower-cost options? More traffic nightmares in any neighborhood that are not needed. Why? The answer is:

  • federal tax credits through CHFA (if DHA is involved as a limited partner, can also qualify for no local property tax assessment);
  • state tax credits through CHFA ( if DHA is involved as a limited partner, can also qualify for no local property tax assessment);
  • urban renewal tax incremental funding (TIF), which diverts regular taxes (including school taxes) to developer for 25 yrs, through DURA and approved by City Council;
  • metropolitan district additional tax overlay through the Colorado Department of Local Affairs and approved by City Council;
  • cash incentives through Denver Revised Municipal Code Chapter 27 and approved by City Council;
  • and, from reading the code and documents, most importantly if any part of the project meets these guidelines, the entire property is tax-exempt! (which has all sorts of $$$ implications for you as a resident).

They are not doing this out of love for the neighborhood, it is a serious herd of cash cows. Like more retail is what we need with everyone using Amazon. Who thought this was a good idea? Look at how many retail spaces have sat vacant for over a year and more.

The most important reason to vote and protest against these things is they destroy open space. The parks in Denver have taken a hit, and there is less open space with each one of these. Research shows that open space and parks are key to mental health. Wonder why people are driving like they are crazy? Maybe there is no green-space place to relax and see a tree close to home.

It does not take a rocket designer to know that mental health relates directly to suicide risk.

Take action and oppose increases in Density.

One of the latest attempts at this is the YMCA on Colorado Blvd. trying to sell the have a developer put in housing and retail. Just what we need, more traffic on Colorado Blvd! Why not just re-vamp the parking and make a park that the members and the community can use? Makes sense if the YMCA is really about the community. However, makes you wonder their goals and what they are making out of the deal. The Euros have the right idea with this.

And remember, just because the council minions and planning bureaucracy want it, that should make you suspicious. Seems like a bit of “we are the professionals, we know what is best for you, just comply…”

Make this a water-shed moment on development. Take action, say no. Until it is done, it can be stopped! Call the YMCA, call Channel 7.

Vote for Your Voice

Amendment 78, Custodial Fund. Vote Yes, more oversight by you!

Prop 119: Vote No, marijuana usage levels are projected to decrease, and thus funding will be here then gone, just expands getting the funds from somewhere else, but your money for sure.

Prop 120: Vote Yes. Reduce property tax rates, and keep the surplus. Nothing wrong with this idea!

Denver 2A-2E: Vote No. More bonds for things the city should have escrowed for and used the money for other things. This will radically increase the cost of housing.

Denver 2F: Vote Yes! City Council wants to increase residential density by up to 150%. Already strained city services, parks and trash. Traffic is now worse than LA! And putting incarceration facilities next to schools is a bad idea no matter the intention. And in significant polling before the council vote, 88% were opposed, only 12% of comments wanted this. Who are they listening to, the developers? Hmmmmnnnn….

2G: Vote No, Independent Monitory Expansion. Simply allows for monitor activity to be politically motivated, no accountability compared to current system.

300: Vote Not So Fast, Pandemic Research Fund. Marijuana levels are projected to decrease, and thus funding will be here then gone, just expands getting the money some were else. Tax grab without request from beneficiary, and no accountability.

Denver Initiated 301: Vote Yes. Denver is already 67% behind on parks and open space compared to similar cities, leading to less mental health and recreation.

Denver 302: Vote Yes. Give Park Hill a say in the golf course property before it becomes 2100 apartments we don’t want or need.

303: Vote No. Homeless Camp Funding. Paid for by DARK money, this establishes homeless camps around the city with no oversight for the $27 million out of your pocket and no way out for the participants. How does this help?

304: Vote Yes, Sales Tax Cap. Denver keeps running a surplus, but now they want more of your money and without your consent? No!

Initiative Mushroom 301, Vote No, Mushroom Initiative. Already enough high drivers and cyclists without adding to the problems. Mental impairment from even small amounts of these mushrooms is a cause of accidents and worse.

Denver School Board

Director at Large: Marla Benavides, strong advocate for literacy.

Director, District 2: Karolina Villagrana, an educator and school leader with great perspective.

Director, District 3: Mike DeGuire, he really understands funding issues.

Director, District 4: Gene Fashaw, because he gets the importance of science.